Blog
When can an insured party challenge their insurance claim settlement?
An insurance agreement binds the insurer to provide the insured party an insurance indemnity upon the occurrence of the insured event. However, in practice, insurers often pay out only part of the insurance indemnity, or in some cases determine a zero-claim settlement. Another problem faced by the insured party may be the insurer’s disregard of the insured party’s notices and complaints, or unreasonably delayed communication with the insured party. How can an insured party defend themselves if they are not satisfied with the way their insured events were settled?
The options to challenge an insurance claim settlement can vary based the type of insurance in question, and also on whether or not the insured party is considered a consumer.
Filing a direct complaint to the insurer
If an insured party is not satisfied with the way their insured event was settled by the insurer, they should first complain directly to the insurer. In the complaint addressed to the insurer, it is advisable to convey disagreement with the settlement of the insured event, and demand a reassessment. If the insurer does not respond to, or rejects, the complaint, it is advisable to seek the assistance of a lawyer specialising in insurance law, and communicate further through them. This approach usually results in the dispute being settled during pre-litigation process.
Filing a proposal for commencing extrajudicial settlement of a consumer dispute with the insurer
This option is possible if the insured is in the position of a “consumer”. A “consumer” is any individual who, outside their trade, business, or profession, deals with the insurer. The purpose of an extrajudicial dispute settlement is to reconcile the dispute between the parties outside a judicial trial. Therefore, to commence an extrajudicial settlement, it is necessary that legal action has not been filed in the case, or that the parties to the dispute have not already agreed upon a reconciliation between themselves. Another important requirement is that the insured party has already tried to claim their rights directly with the insurer.
Filing a proposal for commencing extrajudicial settlement is free of charge, and each party bears its own costs. It can be done within one year from the date on which the insured party tried to claim their rights directly with the insurer. Extrajudicial settlement of a dispute generally ends within 90 days from its initiation.
The authority that can be approached by the insured party for an extrajudicial settlement depends on whether the insurance in question is considered life insurance, or an insurance other than life insurance.
Life insurance is an insurance of an individual with the insured event being their death, reaching a certain age, or other conditions regarding their personal status change. However, sickness insurance and insurance for injury do not belong in this category. Therefore, if the insurance in question is life insurance, the authority empowered to settle an extrajudicial dispute is the Office of the Financial Arbitrator of the Czech Republic.
Insurance other than life insurance can include, among others, property insurance, accident insurance, car insurance, sickness insurance, insurance for injury, or liability insurance. In such cases, the authority empowered to settle extrajudicial disputes is the Czech Trade Inspection Authority (CTIA). These cases can be also referred to the Office of Ombudsman of the Czech Insurers Association, except for cases concerning statutory insurance of an entrepreneur’s liability for damages.
Filing an administrative referral to the Czech National Bank (ČNB)
ČNB supervises over the legality of conduct by insurers for protection of insured parties. All insurers operating in the Czech Republic are subject to supervision of ČNB. The purpose of this supervision is, therefore, not to substitute the activities of courts or arbitrators in dispute settlement between insurers and insured parties, but to protect the financial market as a whole – e.g. supervision over legality of conduct by insurers. Therefore, filing an administrative referral to investigate and assess activities of an insurer does not help to settle a specific dispute. In case the ČNB, within its supervision, finds irregularities in the conduct of an insurer, it can impose obligations on the insurer to remedy the situation. Among the sanction measures that can be imposed are fines, suspension of authorization to conclude insurance contracts, and, in exceptional cases, receivership or even withdrawal of authorization to conduct insurance business.
Are you not satisfied with how an insurance company dealt with your insurance claim? Would you like to consult the details of your case with professionals? Do not hesitate to contact us.
More articles:
Inappropriate Client Behaviour: When Can a Tour Operator or Travel Agency Remove a Client from a...
Do you know when a tour operator or travel agency may remove a client from a tour due to inappropriate behaviour, and when such action by the organiser would be considered unjustified? A recent German court decision concerning a cruise holiday shows... → continue
Markéta Poledníková
Markéta Poledníková
"I was extremely satisfied with the services provided by Holubová advokáti. The collaboration was always professional, systematic, and attentive to detail. At the same time, I greatly appreciated their human and personal approach. Everything was explained to me clearly, I had ample opportunity to ask questions, and I felt a genuine interest in resolving my situation. In my view, the combination of expertise and personal care is exactly what one should expect from legal services. I can wholeheartedly recommend them."
Martin Herna
Martin Herna
"I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to the law firm Holubová advokáti s.r.o. for their professional yet genuinely compassionate approach in an exceptionally difficult period of my life.
The firm successfully represented me in a dispute with my health insurance company concerning reimbursement for a medication that enables me to actively fight an oncological illness and has already begun to show positive treatment results.
From the very outset, I felt a high level of expertise, thoroughness, and a genuine interest not only in the case itself but also in the person behind it. All legal steps were explained clearly and comprehensibly, and the communication was factual, calm, and supported by clear arguments. In a time of great uncertainty, this provided me with a much-needed sense of reassurance and trust.
My special and greatest thanks go to JUDr. Klára Dvořáková, whose commitment, precision, and empathy meant more to me than can be conveyed in just a few sentences. Her work was not only highly professional but also marked by human sensitivity and deep respect for the seriousness of the situation.
I can wholeheartedly recommend this law firm to anyone seeking top-tier legal assistance combined with a truly human approach."
Dietmar Repka
Dietmar Repka
"We express our recommendations for the law firm Holubova Advokati.
Holubova Advokati was able to resolve a project for us with confidence, composure, and perseverance that German experts had deemed hopeless.
About 80 years ago, my grandparents and my father had to leave their home. The property has now been returned to our family through the inheritance that was initiated, and thanks to the excellent work of the law firm.
During the two-and-a-half-year negotiations, there were no language problems; everyone was always well informed about the current status.
Keep up the good work, everyone."