Blog
Do not put things in the common hallway, you are interfering with the property rights of others
If you use the common hallway of the house as a storage place for things you do not want to keep in your apartment, you are limiting the right of the other residents of the house. This follows from the judgment of the Municipal Court in Prague, which confirmed the obligation of the defendant owner of the apartment unit to refrain from placing any items in the common corridor.
If your apartment is cramped and you are thinking of putting away sports equipment, a basket, a chair, a box with decorations, or non-functioning appliances in the hallway or other common areas that are not intended for storing things, you better be careful. If the HOA or one of your neighbours is unhappy, the situation may escalate to litigation, in which the court will order you to remove all the items and you will have to pay the opposing party's legal costs. We know this because we have successfully represented plaintiffs in just such a dispute.
The applicant had long been dissatisfied with his neighbour's placement of used clothing, shoes, bags, a shoe rack, sports equipment and other items intended primarily for sporting activities in the common corridor. As the mutual agreement failed, the applicant had no choice but to seek his right to the empty corridor in court. The claimant was successively successful in his action before the District Court and the Municipal Court in Prague. "Common areas are not used for the storage of the unit owners' belongings which serve their personal needs, their sporting activities, etc., and which should therefore be placed in the apartment unit or in a place designated for that purpose, such as a cellar, a carriage room and a bike room," both courts agreed. That requirement stems not only from the Civil Code but, in particular, from the internal regulations of the HOA or the house rules, which in our particular case also referred to the need to provide a protected escape route in the event of fire, etc. The common areas are intended primarily for access to the unit, for all the residents, and no owner can appropriate the right to use a certain part for himself or to appropriate more rights than he is entitled to. The fact that it is common practice to put things away in your home does not change that.
The defendant in our case also defended on the ground that the plaintiff did not have standing to sue because he did not have the consent of a majority of the other unit owners in the building. However, we succeeded on this point as well. The court held that if the dispute does not concern all the common areas in the building, but the plaintiff seeks protection against interference with his ownership and co-ownership rights only in relation to a particular common area used primarily by the disputants, he may do so without the consent of the majority of the other unit owners in the building. This is then a specific neighbour dispute, the resolution of which does not fall within the competence of the HOA or the administrator.
The judgment in our case has already become final. However, the defendant's belongings have not yet been removed from the common corridor. We are therefore likely to face execution, which can be quite amusing in this case. Stay tuned and you will surely hear soon whether the story has been brought to a conclusion.
Do you have items in the common hallway? Hide them. Got a neighbor who's turning the hallway into a storage room and it doesn't look like a deal? Contact us.
More articles:
Is the travel insurance offered for the trip done the right way?
Before embarking on your travels, it is wise to have travel insurance in place. However, many individuals choose to travel without it. To address this issue, several tour operators and travel agencies either recommend that customers ob... → continue
Markéta Poledníková
Markéta Poledníková
"I was extremely satisfied with the services provided by Holubová advokáti. The collaboration was always professional, systematic, and attentive to detail. At the same time, I greatly appreciated their human and personal approach. Everything was explained to me clearly, I had ample opportunity to ask questions, and I felt a genuine interest in resolving my situation. In my view, the combination of expertise and personal care is exactly what one should expect from legal services. I can wholeheartedly recommend them."
Martin Herna
Martin Herna
"I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to the law firm Holubová advokáti s.r.o. for their professional yet genuinely compassionate approach in an exceptionally difficult period of my life.
The firm successfully represented me in a dispute with my health insurance company concerning reimbursement for a medication that enables me to actively fight an oncological illness and has already begun to show positive treatment results.
From the very outset, I felt a high level of expertise, thoroughness, and a genuine interest not only in the case itself but also in the person behind it. All legal steps were explained clearly and comprehensibly, and the communication was factual, calm, and supported by clear arguments. In a time of great uncertainty, this provided me with a much-needed sense of reassurance and trust.
My special and greatest thanks go to JUDr. Klára Dvořáková, whose commitment, precision, and empathy meant more to me than can be conveyed in just a few sentences. Her work was not only highly professional but also marked by human sensitivity and deep respect for the seriousness of the situation.
I can wholeheartedly recommend this law firm to anyone seeking top-tier legal assistance combined with a truly human approach."
Dietmar Repka
Dietmar Repka
"We express our recommendations for the law firm Holubova Advokati.
Holubova Advokati was able to resolve a project for us with confidence, composure, and perseverance that German experts had deemed hopeless.
About 80 years ago, my grandparents and my father had to leave their home. The property has now been returned to our family through the inheritance that was initiated, and thanks to the excellent work of the law firm.
During the two-and-a-half-year negotiations, there were no language problems; everyone was always well informed about the current status.
Keep up the good work, everyone."