Blog
Bi-Directional Cycling Routes and Blue Zones In Karlín Canceled By the Court For the Fifth Time
Since 2016, the Office of the Municipal District of Prague 8 has been trying to abolish the functioning bi-direction cycling routes in Karlín "at any cost." Štěpán Holub from Holubova advokati, for the Auto*Mat association and Tomáš Hnyk, after the successful repeal of almost identical measures of a general nature from 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020, succeeded again yesterday before the Municipal Court in Prague with a proposal to repeal the measure from January 2021. Despite the fact that the goal of the association was to only abolish the restrictions on cyclists and pedestrians, the so-called blue zones were also abolished.
In 2012, directions for cycling were introduced in Karlín within zone 30. At that time, it was a revolutionary act in urban transport planning. The whole concept is based on the fact that pedestrians and cyclists, who take up little space, do not need to be restricted when moving in the city. Therefore, cyclists were allowed to ride in the opposite direction on a one direction route, and the speed limit was restricted to 30 km/h for safety reasons. Only cars, being larger means of transport, need to be banned in riding in the opposite direction in some cases.
According to international studies, meeting a cyclist when driving a car in the opposite direction is, paradoxically, safer than overtaking a cyclist with a car in the same direction, because 4 eyes assess the former situation whereas, in the latter event, only 2 eyes assess the conditions.
However, the litigation is not just about cycling measures. So far, Prague 8 has not been able to deal with proposals to introduce a short-time stop area for the supply of courier services, which, due to lack of space, often park on sidewalks and pedestrian crossings "on flashers", or proposals to establish parking spaces for shared bicycles and scooters on which pedestrians otherwise stumble on the sidewalks. Requests for the removal of the railing in the middle of Karlinske squaire, which interferes in exiting out of a parked car onto the sidewalk, or proposals for moving the parking spaces from the sidewalks to the roadway, also remain unheard.
After the repealed measure of a general nature from 2020, Prague 8 issued another almost identical measure, this time for a period of two months. However, before the court could decide on the proposal, the measure was replaced by the January 2021 measure, this time for a period of one year. In the present proceedings, an amendment to the application was allowed, and it was finally decided to abolish the January measure. The January 2021 measure of a general nature was abolished by the Municipal Court today.
The city district once again has 90 days to issue a new measure of a general nature that will regulate traffic in Karlín. We can only hope that this time Prague 8 will take into account the opinions of citizens.
More articles:
Stewarts
'No one has done as much for me as you,' Eva said.
Stewarts
"A visit to her daughter in London turned Eva's life upside down when she says she stepped into a crossing on a green light but was hit by a car. Despite her remarkable bravery, she faced a long treatment due to fractures in her pelvis, and the associated limitations and pain are likely to persist for the rest of her life. Regular headaches and impaired concentration compound her challenges.
Eva contacted us through an organization temporarily helping her manage her difficult living situation. At that time, she was destitute, relying only on subsistence payments. We were able to assist her because we specialize in personal injury and have contacts with proven colleagues abroad.
We worked with Stewarts, a UK law firm, on this case. Attorneys Klára Dvořáková and Rebecca Huxford helped Eva with the documentation in her case, explaining her options and the differences between the Czech and British systems of healthcare and social benefits reimbursement. Within a few months, thanks to the professional cooperation between the two offices, an offer of compensation from the insurance company of approximately CZK seven million was achieved. The client accepted this settlement because she did not want to deal with courts in the United Kingdom.
Subsequently, we assisted the client with related tax issues and contacted Auditone, a tax consultancy firm, which arranged for the filing of a tax return. Compensation for lost income is taxable, unlike most personal injury compensation.
'No one has done as much for me as you,' Eva said.
The fact that we were able to help Eva gives our work meaning and brings us great joy. We are very happy that, thanks to our many years of active involvement in the international professional organization PEOPIL, we can cooperate on such cases."
Livingstone, Tour Operator
Thank you again for your valuable advice. I breathe better when I know who to turn to.
Livingstone, Tour Operator
"Thank you again for your valuable advice. I breathe better when I know who to turn to."
Anders Thorsen Advokatanpartsselskab
It has been an absolute pleasure to work with you.
Anders Thorsen Advokatanpartsselskab
"It has been an absolute pleasure to work with you and your colleagues. Your advice and way of handling the matter and our communication has been of the highest quality and we are very happy with the outcome.
If any of my clients need assistance in matters in the Czech Republic in the future, I know who to recommend."