Blog
City Hall's procedure was not justified, ruled the Municipal Court
Another success for our clients. The Municipal Court in Prague ruled that the increase in parking spaces at the expense of pavement width was not sufficiently justified. The measure of a general nature issued by the Prague 4 municipality will be cancelled 60 days after the judgment becomes final.
Last October, the Prague 4 City Hall modified the parking rules in Horní Street in Nusle. Drivers now had the option of partial diagonal parking on the pavement on one side and longitudinal parking on the pavement on the other side of the street. The space for pedestrians was thus almost halved.
According to local residents, the modifications endangered the safety of the street
Although the district defended itself by saying that it had initiated the change in parking on the basis of a local request, some residents disagreed with the new layout of their street. This was mainly due to the substantial reduction of the space used by pedestrians and the reduction of the quality of everyday functioning in the street, including the threat to safety. The parking spaces and the pavement itself are separated only by white horizontal markings and cars often enter the pedestrian space.
The council must cancel or justify the measure
The Municipal Court in Prague accepted our client's objection relating to the insufficient justification of the measure. The court considered it too general and recalled that "the reasons for the statement, the grounds for its adoption and the reasoning followed by the administrative authority in its assessment and interpretation of the legal provisions must also be stated in the justification of a measure of a general nature" (NNS judgment No. 1 Ao 3/2008-136, No. 1795/2009 Coll. of the SAC of 16 December 2008). The court also pointed out the importance of such justifications in relation to the general abuse of power.
The Prague 4 municipal district has 60 days from the legal entry into force of the judgment to consider further action regarding the modifications to Horní Street. If it decides to set the measure in the same wording, it must properly justify it. Otherwise, the modifications will be removed.
This is the second court decision in a relatively short period of time that has found in favour of people opposed to the expansion of parking spaces at the expense of space used by city residents. Perhaps Prague will soon join the trend in many European cities.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you are facing a similar situation.
More articles:
Is the travel insurance offered for the trip done the right way?
Before embarking on your travels, it is wise to have travel insurance in place. However, many individuals choose to travel without it. To address this issue, several tour operators and travel agencies either recommend that customers ob... → continue
Markéta Poledníková
Markéta Poledníková
"I was extremely satisfied with the services provided by Holubová advokáti. The collaboration was always professional, systematic, and attentive to detail. At the same time, I greatly appreciated their human and personal approach. Everything was explained to me clearly, I had ample opportunity to ask questions, and I felt a genuine interest in resolving my situation. In my view, the combination of expertise and personal care is exactly what one should expect from legal services. I can wholeheartedly recommend them."
Martin Herna
Martin Herna
"I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to the law firm Holubová advokáti s.r.o. for their professional yet genuinely compassionate approach in an exceptionally difficult period of my life.
The firm successfully represented me in a dispute with my health insurance company concerning reimbursement for a medication that enables me to actively fight an oncological illness and has already begun to show positive treatment results.
From the very outset, I felt a high level of expertise, thoroughness, and a genuine interest not only in the case itself but also in the person behind it. All legal steps were explained clearly and comprehensibly, and the communication was factual, calm, and supported by clear arguments. In a time of great uncertainty, this provided me with a much-needed sense of reassurance and trust.
My special and greatest thanks go to JUDr. Klára Dvořáková, whose commitment, precision, and empathy meant more to me than can be conveyed in just a few sentences. Her work was not only highly professional but also marked by human sensitivity and deep respect for the seriousness of the situation.
I can wholeheartedly recommend this law firm to anyone seeking top-tier legal assistance combined with a truly human approach."
Dietmar Repka
Dietmar Repka
"We express our recommendations for the law firm Holubova Advokati.
Holubova Advokati was able to resolve a project for us with confidence, composure, and perseverance that German experts had deemed hopeless.
About 80 years ago, my grandparents and my father had to leave their home. The property has now been returned to our family through the inheritance that was initiated, and thanks to the excellent work of the law firm.
During the two-and-a-half-year negotiations, there were no language problems; everyone was always well informed about the current status.
Keep up the good work, everyone."