Blog
Will the new directive supporting the fight against legalisation of proceeds from crime prevent concealment of equity participations in companies?
On 20 May 2015, the European Parliament approved another directive – the fourth in a row –supporting the fight against the legalisation of proceeds from crime. Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing(the “Directive”) also commits Member States to guarantee greater transparency of ownership structures in companies and other legal entities registered in their territories, including the transparency of trusts.
In line with the Directive, it will be possible to identify the actual owners of a company and other legal entities, or the owner, beneficiary and administrator of trusts, based on information set out in the commercial register or other public register. In this regard, the Directive imposes on Member States the obligation to obtain and hold “adequate, accurate and current information on their beneficial ownership, including the details of the beneficial interests held.” However, the availability of data from public registers will not be unlimited. The Directive guarantees free access to information to designated bodies and “obliged entities”, such as financial and credit institutions. Public access to the register may, however, continue to be substantially restricted.
The public, i.e., natural persons/individuals or organisations, will be entitled to review the register only if they demonstrate “legitimate interest”. Member States will then be obliged to make accessible at least information about the name, the month and year of birth, nationality and country of residence of the beneficial owner as well as the nature and extent of the beneficial interest held. Nevertheless, Member States will be able to condition access to the register on prior registration online and a fee up to the administrative costs or refuse access to the register for special reasons. With regard to trusts, the Directive does not contemplate public access to them at all.
In relation to public institutions, the possibility to conceal equity participations in companies or trust ends upon implementation of the Directive into the law of the Member States. The public, however, may continue to not have access to such information without demonstrating serious reasons.
Member States are obliged to implement the obligations under the Directive into national legislation by 26 June 2017. One can only hope that the Directive will not be implemented into Czech law in such an extensive way that would, in the interests of money laundering, even more negate the purpose of various legal concepts, the essence of which is confidentiality.
More articles:
Jasper Brinkman
Jasper Brinkman
"Following a devastating hotel fire in Prague, the law firm Holubová advokáti, led by attorney Klara Dvorakova, successfully represented our extended family as a group of victims. The firm navigated complex international insurance and compensation laws to defend our rights.
I would like to acknowledge the extraordinary efforts the firm had to make to bring our case to a successful compensation under extremely difficult circumstances."
Stewarts
Stewarts
"A visit to her daughter in London turned Eva's life upside down when she says she stepped into a crossing on a green light but was hit by a car. Despite her remarkable bravery, she faced a long treatment due to fractures in her pelvis, and the associated limitations and pain are likely to persist for the rest of her life. Regular headaches and impaired concentration compound her challenges.
Eva contacted us through an organization temporarily helping her manage her difficult living situation. At that time, she was destitute, relying only on subsistence payments. We were able to assist her because we specialize in personal injury and have contacts with proven colleagues abroad.
We worked with Stewarts, a UK law firm, on this case. Attorneys Klára Dvořáková and Rebecca Huxford helped Eva with the documentation in her case, explaining her options and the differences between the Czech and British systems of healthcare and social benefits reimbursement. Within a few months, thanks to the professional cooperation between the two offices, an offer of compensation from the insurance company of approximately CZK seven million was achieved. The client accepted this settlement because she did not want to deal with courts in the United Kingdom.
Subsequently, we assisted the client with related tax issues and contacted Auditone, a tax consultancy firm, which arranged for the filing of a tax return. Compensation for lost income is taxable, unlike most personal injury compensation.
'No one has done as much for me as you,' Eva said.
The fact that we were able to help Eva gives our work meaning and brings us great joy. We are very happy that, thanks to our many years of active involvement in the international professional organization PEOPIL, we can cooperate on such cases."