Blog
Starting July, it is permissible to plant tree avenues half a meter from adjacent fields
A new legal regulation will allow planting trees along roads that are at a distance of 0.5 meters from the boundaries of adjacent plots.
This amendment to the Road Act will have a positive impact on efforts to plant trees, tree avenues, and rows of trees along roads and paths. The amendment introduces an entirely new paragraph 3 to §15 of the Road Act, which includes exceptions to the general rules for tree distances from plot boundaries.
For planting trees along roads and paths, the general rule contained in §1017 of the Civil Code previously mandated that trees typically exceeding 3 meters in height could be planted at a distance of 3 meters from plot boundaries, and other trees at a distance of 1.5 meters, unless local customs dictated otherwise.
The rule contained in §15, paragraph 1 of the Road Act still applies, stating that roadside vegetation must not endanger the safe use of the road or unreasonably impede access, maintenance, or management of adjacent plots.
Starting this July, an additional paragraph 3 will be added to this provision- On road plots, the permissible distance of a tree from the shared boundary with adjacent plots according to the Civil Code will be reduced to the extent necessary to meet the requirements of paragraph 1, but not less than 0.5 meters. On plots that are adjacent to publicly accessible purpose-built roads, this distance will be reduced to the extent necessary to ensure the safety of use of this road, but not less than 0.5 meters.
Trees that will be planted on strips of land alongside roads can now be planted at a distance of half a meter from adjacent fields or other plots. Rules will be more relaxed for plots adjacent to publicly accessible purpose-built roads compared to planting along roads. Trees along roads can be planted at a distance of 0.5 meters from plot boundaries, with the only limiting factor being the safety of road use. In the case of planting along roads, trees must also not unreasonably impede access, maintenance, or management of adjacent plots. Roadside auxiliary land means a strip of land adjacent on both sides to the body of the road owned by the owner of that road.
The existing legal framework concerning tree planting along roads and paths has often been considered too rigid. This has led to practical problems where planting new trees was challenging and, in some cases, practically impossible.
The amendment emphasizes strengthening the protection of ecological functions in agricultural landscapes and introduces a comprehensive legislative framework for soil protection, now including the protection of landscape elements such as standalone trees, tree avenues, and rows of trees. This is a step towards better integration of greenery into road infrastructure. These changes will enable a more flexible approach to tree planting along roads and paths, which is crucial for preserving the landscape's character and ecological stability. In practice, this means that tree planting will be feasible along many roadways where it was previously not possible.
More articles:
Navigating Crisis Situations in Tourism: How to Handle Them?
contact usThe Association of Travel Agencies in the Czech Republic ("ACK") has crafted a brochure addressing the resolution of crisis situations in tourism. These scenarios encompass incidents such as injuries or fatalities, significan... → continue
Jasper Brinkman
Jasper Brinkman
"Following a devastating hotel fire in Prague, the law firm Holubová advokáti, led by attorney Klara Dvorakova, successfully represented our extended family as a group of victims. The firm navigated complex international insurance and compensation laws to defend our rights.
I would like to acknowledge the extraordinary efforts the firm had to make to bring our case to a successful compensation under extremely difficult circumstances."
Stewarts
Stewarts
"A visit to her daughter in London turned Eva's life upside down when she says she stepped into a crossing on a green light but was hit by a car. Despite her remarkable bravery, she faced a long treatment due to fractures in her pelvis, and the associated limitations and pain are likely to persist for the rest of her life. Regular headaches and impaired concentration compound her challenges.
Eva contacted us through an organization temporarily helping her manage her difficult living situation. At that time, she was destitute, relying only on subsistence payments. We were able to assist her because we specialize in personal injury and have contacts with proven colleagues abroad.
We worked with Stewarts, a UK law firm, on this case. Attorneys Klára Dvořáková and Rebecca Huxford helped Eva with the documentation in her case, explaining her options and the differences between the Czech and British systems of healthcare and social benefits reimbursement. Within a few months, thanks to the professional cooperation between the two offices, an offer of compensation from the insurance company of approximately CZK seven million was achieved. The client accepted this settlement because she did not want to deal with courts in the United Kingdom.
Subsequently, we assisted the client with related tax issues and contacted Auditone, a tax consultancy firm, which arranged for the filing of a tax return. Compensation for lost income is taxable, unlike most personal injury compensation.
'No one has done as much for me as you,' Eva said.
The fact that we were able to help Eva gives our work meaning and brings us great joy. We are very happy that, thanks to our many years of active involvement in the international professional organization PEOPIL, we can cooperate on such cases."