Blog
Everything you need to know about whistleblowing
Whistleblowing translates as blowing the whistle. The use of a whistle in most situations signifies a warning of something forbidden. Something we shouldn't do within the rules of the situation and place. And it doesn't matter whether it's a lifeguard, a sports official, or an employee blowing it. The term whistleblowing refers specifically to a situation where an employee - current or former - calls attention to unethical or illegal practices in the workplace.
4 Employer's obligations
Why do we need a separate term, reporting systems, or even a law for something as obvious as reporting illegal practices? What may seem like an obvious step in theory takes very different forms in practice. Without the measures in place, they may well lead to the problem never being discovered, or being discovered much later and with more damage.
The Whistleblower Protection Act and its associated obligations make sense primarily because they aim to create a safe environment in which a problem can be freely raised with the appropriate authority by minimising, as much as possible, the risks the whistleblower could be exposed to. At the same time, they also ensure that employees know where and to whom to turn.
There are four basic obligations under the Whistleblower Protection Act:
- Prohibition of Retaliation
- Establishing an internal whistleblowing system
- Designation of an appropriate person
- Information duty
Fines of up to CZK 1 million
It is not always straightforward to determing who is covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act. However, the prohibition on retaliation applies to all employers. The rule of this prohibition is simple but fundamental. Employees should make a report knowing that they will not be punished for their efforts to do the right thing. The employer must not in any way persecute the employee who has made the report. Non-renewal of the employment contract, removal from a managerial position, or non-award of bonuses is not an option. If this does happen, the employer may be fined up to CZK 1 million.
Other obligations apply to employers with more than 50 employees.
Awareness as a basic step
Each obliged entity must provide its employees with the necessary information in the context of the Whistleblower Protection Act. This must be accessible remotely. The best place to do this is usually directly on a website. The information should include:
- How to whistleblow. Employees should have access to information on how to report via the internal reporting system. There should also be a mention of how to report directly to the Ministry of Justice.
- Who is the appropriate person. Including their contact details.
- Whether the receipt of notifications is restricted and how. Typically, this may be where notifications from persons who are not and have not been employees of the obligated entity are excluded.
Internal and external notification system
An internal notification system should not only make the handling of notifications more efficient but also contribute to building trust. There are several platforms in the Czech Republic to which obliged entities can turn. One of them is Don't Let It Be. Such platforms provide many benefits, for example, they take over the whole process of receiving notifications.
In addition to these, there is an external reporting system managed by the Ministry of Justice. It primarily serves whistleblowers whose employers are not required to set up an internal whistleblowing system.
Notifications made through the internal or external notification system are always received by the relevant person. It is their task to assess whether the notification is justified. In other words, whether or not it falls under the Whistleblower Protection Act. The relevant person may be any natural person who is of good character, of legal age, and fully competent. However, when selecting a whistleblower, it must be kept in mind that he or she must be familiar not only with the Whistleblower Protection Act, but also with the regulations to which it refers.
Submission and assessment of the report
A key factor in the whole process is that only the relevant person has access to the notification and the identity of the employee. The latter will acknowledge receipt of the notification to the notifier within 7 days, and assess it within 30 days. In exceptional cases, the deadline may be extended by a further 30 days. However, this procedure can only be repeated twice.
As a rule, three situations arise. The person concerned:
- Determines that the report does not fall under the Whistleblower Protection Act and notifies the whistleblower.
- Concludes that the notification is not justified and advises the whistleblower of the right to file a notification with the public authority.
- Assess that the notification is justified and propose remedial measures to the obliged entity, i.e. the employer.
We regularly report on whistleblowing and other topics on our Linkedin profile. If you would prefer to listen to something, watch the video of our webinar for schools.
If there is anything else you feel you need to know or help with, please do not hesitate to contact us.
More articles:
Change in Obligations When Employing Foreign Nationals
From 1 October 2025, the amendment to the Employment Act, adopted in connection with the new so-called “super benefit,” comes into effect. This has also led to stricter rules for reporting the commencement of employment of foreign nati... → continue
Dietmar Repka
Dietmar Repka
"We express our recommendations for the law firm Holubova Advokati.
Holubova Advokati was able to resolve a project for us with confidence, composure, and perseverance that German experts had deemed hopeless.
About 80 years ago, my grandparents and my father had to leave their home. The property has now been returned to our family through the inheritance that was initiated, and thanks to the excellent work of the law firm.
During the two-and-a-half-year negotiations, there were no language problems; everyone was always well informed about the current status.
Keep up the good work, everyone."
Jan Divíšek
Jan Divíšek
"I want to thank everyone at Holubová advokáti s.r.o. for their legal services in handling my protection of personality rights lawsuit."
Denis Krytinář, M.A.
Denis Krytinář, M.A.
"What I appreciate most about working with Holubová Advokáti is their high level of expertise, clear guidance throughout the entire process, and their human approach. My case was complex and emotionally demanding, but Mrs. Dvořáková and Mr. Formánek treated me with the utmost care and sensitivity. Thanks to their precise work, we achieved a successful outcome, and I can therefore recommend this firm with complete confidence to anyone seeking legal representation of the highest standard."